FCOM vs VYM
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FCOM | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1.7B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 92 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -2.62% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.41% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.26% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.20% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2013 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FCOM vs VYM Performance
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FCOM returned +8.41% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, FCOM is down 2.62% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, FCOM compounded at +20.26% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +6.20% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, FCOM has the edge at +8.81% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FCOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.8% for FCOM and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FCOM charges 0.08% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $4 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FCOM currently yields 1.01% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FCOM and VYM share 12 holdings out of 633 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FCOM or VYM?
FCOM has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FCOM or VYM?
Over the past year FCOM returned +8.41% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FCOM annualized +8.81% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FCOM or VYM?
FCOM has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FCOM -46.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FCOM and VYM?
FCOM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FCOM and VYM?
FCOM and VYM share 12 common holdings with a 2.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 633 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FCOM or VYM?
FCOM yields 1.01% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.