FCOM vs VXUS
FCOM vs VXUS
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FCOM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.7B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 92 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -2.62% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.41% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.26% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.20% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2013 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FCOM vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FCOM returned +8.41% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, FCOM is down 2.62% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, FCOM compounded at +20.26% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +6.20% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, FCOM has the edge at +8.81% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FCOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.8% for FCOM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FCOM charges 0.08% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $5 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FCOM currently yields 1.01% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FCOM and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7947 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FCOM | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHEN | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FCOM or VXUS?
FCOM has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FCOM or VXUS?
Over the past year FCOM returned +8.41% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FCOM annualized +8.81% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FCOM or VXUS?
FCOM has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FCOM -46.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FCOM and VXUS?
FCOM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FCOM and VXUS?
FCOM and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7947 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FCOM or VXUS?
FCOM yields 1.01% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.