FDAT vs IVV
Tactical Advantage ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FDAT or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 80.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDAT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $37M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.80% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 14 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +3.86% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.70% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.06% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.7%Best | 12.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.2%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $13,122 | $19,313Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 80.8% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Tactical Advantage | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 11, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 20, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.4 years).
FDAT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
FDAT vs IVV Performance
Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) is an ETF from Tactical Advantage and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FDAT returned +5.70% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, FDAT is up 3.86% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, FDAT compounded at +9.06% per year against +21.38% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 8.7% for FDAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.2% for FDAT and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDAT charges 1.16% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $3 annually, a gap of $113 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDAT currently yields 5.80% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 15 holdings in FDAT and 490 in IVV, totalling 100.0% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 15 positions we hold weights for in FDAT and 490 in IVV, against full books of 14 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 15 and 490 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 482 positions FDAT does not, 98.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FDAT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDAT or IVV?
FDAT has an expense ratio of 1.16% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $113 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FDAT or IVV?
Over the past year FDAT returned +5.70% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FDAT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 8.7% for FDAT. Worst drawdown: FDAT -8.2% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both FDAT and IVV?
FDAT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDAT or IVV?
FDAT yields 5.80% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FDAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FDAT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 80.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.