FDAT vs IVV
Tactical Advantage ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDAT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $36M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.84% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +6.70% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.72% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.48% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Tactical Advantage | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 11, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
FDAT vs IVV Performance
Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) is a ETF from Tactical Advantage and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FDAT returned +11.72% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, FDAT is up 6.70% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, FDAT compounded at +9.48% per year against +21.80% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, FDAT has the edge at +9.46% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 8.8% for FDAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.2% for FDAT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDAT charges 0.78% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDAT currently yields 5.84% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FDAT and IVV share 0 holdings out of 524 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDAT or IVV?
FDAT has an expense ratio of 0.78% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDAT or IVV?
Over the past year FDAT returned +11.72% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDAT annualized +9.46% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDAT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 8.8% for FDAT. Worst drawdown: FDAT -8.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FDAT and IVV?
FDAT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDAT and IVV?
FDAT and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 524 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDAT or IVV?
FDAT yields 5.84% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FDAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.