FDAT vs VTI
Tactical Advantage ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDAT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $36M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.84% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.70% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.72% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.48% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Tactical Advantage | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 11, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
FDAT vs VTI Performance
Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) is a ETF from Tactical Advantage and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDAT returned +11.72% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, FDAT is up 6.70% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, FDAT compounded at +9.48% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, FDAT has the edge at +9.46% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 8.8% for FDAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.2% for FDAT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDAT charges 0.78% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDAT currently yields 5.84% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FDAT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2802 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDAT or VTI?
FDAT has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDAT or VTI?
Over the past year FDAT returned +11.72% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDAT annualized +9.46% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDAT or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 8.8% for FDAT. Worst drawdown: FDAT -8.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FDAT and VTI?
FDAT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDAT and VTI?
FDAT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2802 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDAT or VTI?
FDAT yields 5.84% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FDAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.