FDAT vs VOO
Tactical Advantage ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDAT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $37M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.90% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +5.04% | +12.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.80% | +21.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.77% | +20.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Tactical Advantage | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 11, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FDAT vs VOO Performance
Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) is a ETF from Tactical Advantage and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDAT returned +10.80% while VOO returned +21.15%. Year to date, FDAT is up 5.04% versus a gain of 12.87% for VOO.
Over three years, FDAT compounded at +8.77% per year against +20.93% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.46% annualized vs +8.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.7% for FDAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.2% for FDAT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDAT charges 1.16% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $3 annually, a gap of $113 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDAT currently yields 5.90% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FDAT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDAT or VOO?
FDAT has an expense ratio of 1.16% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $113 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDAT or VOO?
Over the past year FDAT returned +10.80% vs +21.15% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FDAT annualized +8.81% vs +13.46% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDAT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.7% for FDAT. Worst drawdown: FDAT -8.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FDAT and VOO?
FDAT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDAT and VOO?
FDAT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDAT or VOO?
FDAT yields 5.90% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FDAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.