FLBR vs SCHD

FLBR vs SCHD

Which is better, FLBR or SCHD?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FLBR led over 1Y, SCHD over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.2%.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: SCHD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLBRSCHD
Expense Ratio0.19%0.06%Best
AUM$576M$112.2B
Dividend Yield5.70%3.13%
Holdings73103
YTD Return+22.92%+27.56%Best
1Y Return+38.49%Best+30.29%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.10%+16.37%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+10.04%+10.23%Best
Volatility (annualized)31.7%16.1%Best
Max Drawdown-57.4%-33.4%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$16,134$16,274Best
Top 10 Weight55.2%41.5%Best
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionNov 3, 2017Oct 20, 2011

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Sep 4, 2026 (8.8 years).

FLBR vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.8 years both funds cover.

FLBR vs SCHD Performance

Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FLBR returned +38.49% while SCHD returned +30.29%. Year to date, FLBR is up 22.92% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.

Over three years, FLBR compounded at +15.10% per year against +16.37% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +10.04% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.45% annualized vs +4.55%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FLBR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.7% compared with 16.1% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.4% for FLBR and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLBR charges 0.19% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $6 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLBR currently yields 5.70% against 3.13% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 66 holdings in FLBR and 100 in SCHD, totalling 97.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in FLBR and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 73 and 103.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for FLBR (99.9% of the fund), and 1 for FLBR that do not appear in SCHD (0.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FLBR and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FLBRSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLBR or SCHD?

FLBR has an expense ratio of 0.19% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FLBR or SCHD?

Over the past year FLBR returned +38.49% vs +30.29% for SCHD, so FLBR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLBR annualized +4.55% vs +11.45% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FLBR or SCHD?

FLBR has been the more volatile fund at 31.7% annualized versus 16.1% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: FLBR -57.4% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both FLBR and SCHD?

FLBR and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLBR or SCHD?

FLBR yields 5.70% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so FLBR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than FLBR?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FLBR led over 1Y, SCHD over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.