FLBR vs IVV
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FLBR or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FLBR led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLBR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $576M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.70% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 73 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +22.92%Best | +13.39% |
| 1Y Return | +38.49%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.10% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.7% | 16.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -57.4% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,134 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.2% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 3, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Sep 4, 2026 (8.8 years).
FLBR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.8 years both funds cover.
FLBR vs IVV Performance
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FLBR returned +38.49% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, FLBR is up 22.92% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, FLBR compounded at +15.10% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.04% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.11% annualized vs +4.55%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLBR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.7% compared with 16.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.4% for FLBR and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLBR charges 0.19% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLBR currently yields 5.70% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 66 holdings in FLBR and 504 in IVV, totalling 97.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in FLBR and 504 in IVV, against full books of 73 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FLBR (99.2% of the fund), and 1 for FLBR that do not appear in IVV (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLBR and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLBR or IVV?
FLBR has an expense ratio of 0.19% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLBR or IVV?
Over the past year FLBR returned +38.49% vs +20.08% for IVV, so FLBR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLBR annualized +4.55% vs +14.11% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLBR or IVV?
FLBR has been the more volatile fund at 31.7% annualized versus 16.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FLBR -57.4% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both FLBR and IVV?
FLBR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLBR or IVV?
FLBR yields 5.70% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FLBR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FLBR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FLBR led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.