FLBR vs VTI
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FLBR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLBR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $529M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.70% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.95% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.96% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.36% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.76% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 3, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
FLBR vs VTI Performance
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLBR returned +31.96% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, FLBR is up 10.95% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, FLBR compounded at +12.36% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.76% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLBR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.4% for FLBR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLBR charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLBR currently yields 5.70% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FLBR and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2851 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLBR or VTI?
FLBR has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLBR or VTI?
Over the past year FLBR returned +31.96% vs +22.17% for VTI, so FLBR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLBR annualized +3.36% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLBR or VTI?
FLBR has been the more volatile fund at 31.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FLBR -57.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FLBR and VTI?
FLBR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLBR and VTI?
FLBR and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2851 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLBR or VTI?
FLBR yields 5.70% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FLBR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.