FLBR vs QQQ
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLBR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $529M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.70% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +8.74% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.23% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.03% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.23% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 3, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FLBR vs QQQ Performance
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FLBR returned +25.23% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, FLBR is up 8.74% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, FLBR compounded at +11.03% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.23% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +3.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLBR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.0% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.4% for FLBR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLBR charges 0.19% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $18 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLBR currently yields 5.70% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FLBR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 166 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLBR or QQQ?
FLBR has an expense ratio of 0.19% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLBR or QQQ?
Over the past year FLBR returned +25.23% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLBR annualized +3.12% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLBR or QQQ?
FLBR has been the more volatile fund at 32.0% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: FLBR -57.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FLBR and QQQ?
FLBR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLBR and QQQ?
FLBR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 166 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLBR or QQQ?
FLBR yields 5.70% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FLBR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.