FLKR vs VTI
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FLKR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLKR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.12% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 166 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +72.99% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +147.25% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +45.85% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.22% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
FLKR vs VTI Performance
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLKR returned +147.25% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, FLKR is up 72.99% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, FLKR compounded at +45.85% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +18.22% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLKR has the edge at +11.74% annualized vs +8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLKR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.5% for FLKR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLKR charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLKR currently yields 3.12% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FLKR and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2942 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLKR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACI | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLKR or VTI?
FLKR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLKR or VTI?
Over the past year FLKR returned +147.25% vs +22.17% for VTI, so FLKR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLKR annualized +11.74% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLKR or VTI?
FLKR has been the more volatile fund at 31.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FLKR -50.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FLKR and VTI?
FLKR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLKR and VTI?
FLKR and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2942 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLKR or VTI?
FLKR yields 3.12% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FLKR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.