FLKR vs VOO
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FLKR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLKR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.12% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 166 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +78.28% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +147.18% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +46.35% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.09% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.9% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLKR vs VOO Performance
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLKR returned +147.18% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, FLKR is up 78.28% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, FLKR compounded at +46.35% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +18.09% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLKR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.9% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.5% for FLKR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLKR charges 0.09% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLKR currently yields 3.12% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLKR and VOO share 0 holdings out of 661 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLKR or VOO?
FLKR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLKR or VOO?
Over the past year FLKR returned +147.18% vs +21.79% for VOO, so FLKR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLKR annualized +12.14% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLKR or VOO?
FLKR has been the more volatile fund at 31.9% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FLKR -50.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLKR and VOO?
FLKR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLKR and VOO?
FLKR and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 661 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLKR or VOO?
FLKR yields 3.12% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FLKR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.