FLKR vs QQQ
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
FLKR has a lower expense ratio. FLKR delivered stronger 1-year returns. FLKR offers more diversification with 166 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLKR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.12% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 166 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +69.26% | +17.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +137.71% | +24.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +44.84% | +26.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.27% | +15.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FLKR vs QQQ Performance
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FLKR returned +137.71% while QQQ returned +24.93%. Year to date, FLKR is up 69.26% versus a gain of 17.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, FLKR compounded at +44.84% per year against +26.19% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +17.27% and +15.34% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.06% annualized vs +11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLKR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.7% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.5% for FLKR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLKR charges 0.09% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $18 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLKR currently yields 3.12% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FLKR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 258 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLKR or QQQ?
FLKR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while QQQ charges 0.18%. FLKR is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLKR or QQQ?
Over the past year FLKR returned +137.71% vs +24.93% for QQQ, so FLKR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLKR annualized +11.46% vs +13.06% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLKR or QQQ?
FLKR has been the more volatile fund at 31.7% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: FLKR -50.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FLKR and QQQ?
FLKR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLKR and QQQ?
FLKR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 258 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLKR or QQQ?
FLKR yields 3.12% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FLKR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.