FLKR vs SCHD
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FLKR delivered stronger 1-year returns. FLKR offers more diversification with 166 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLKR | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.12% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 166 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +78.28% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +147.18% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +46.35% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.09% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.9% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.5% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Oct 20, 2011 |
FLKR vs SCHD Performance
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FLKR returned +147.18% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, FLKR is up 78.28% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, FLKR compounded at +46.35% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +18.09% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLKR has the edge at +12.14% annualized vs +11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLKR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.9% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.5% for FLKR and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLKR charges 0.09% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLKR currently yields 3.12% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
FLKR and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 256 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLKR or SCHD?
FLKR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLKR or SCHD?
Over the past year FLKR returned +147.18% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so FLKR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLKR annualized +12.14% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLKR or SCHD?
FLKR has been the more volatile fund at 31.9% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: FLKR -50.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both FLKR and SCHD?
FLKR and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLKR and SCHD?
FLKR and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 256 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLKR or SCHD?
FLKR yields 3.12% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.