FLMB vs QQQ
Franklin Municipal Green Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLMB | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $75M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.61% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 90 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.94% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.73% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.95% | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.27% | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FLMB vs QQQ Performance
Franklin Municipal Green Bond ETF (FLMB) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FLMB returned +6.73% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, FLMB is up 0.94% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Over three years, FLMB compounded at +3.95% per year against +25.79% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +0.27% and +15.20% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.10% annualized vs +1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 6.7% for FLMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for FLMB and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLMB charges 0.30% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $18 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLMB currently yields 3.61% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FLMB and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 134 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLMB or QQQ?
FLMB has an expense ratio of 0.30% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLMB or QQQ?
Over the past year FLMB returned +6.73% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLMB annualized +1.28% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLMB or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 6.7% for FLMB. Worst drawdown: FLMB -17.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FLMB and QQQ?
FLMB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLMB and QQQ?
FLMB and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 134 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLMB or QQQ?
FLMB yields 3.61% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so FLMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.