FLRG vs VXUS
FLRG vs VXUS
Fidelity US Multifactor ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLRG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $289M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.38% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 105 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +13.75% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.46% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.37% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.54% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FLRG vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity US Multifactor ETF (FLRG) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLRG returned +19.46% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, FLRG is up 13.75% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, FLRG compounded at +19.37% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.54% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FLRG has the edge at +15.62% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.8% for FLRG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for FLRG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLRG charges 0.15% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $5 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLRG currently yields 1.38% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FLRG and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7959 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLRG or VXUS?
FLRG has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLRG or VXUS?
Over the past year FLRG returned +19.46% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FLRG annualized +15.62% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLRG or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.8% for FLRG. Worst drawdown: FLRG -19.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FLRG and VXUS?
FLRG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLRG and VXUS?
FLRG and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7959 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLRG or VXUS?
FLRG yields 1.38% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.