FLRG vs VOO
Fidelity US Multifactor ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FLRG or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLRG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $290M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.37% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 103 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +12.75% | +13.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.53% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.71% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6%Best | 15.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,631 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.5% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 17, 2020 to Sep 4, 2026 (6 years).
FLRG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6 years both funds cover.
FLRG vs VOO Performance
Fidelity US Multifactor ETF (FLRG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLRG returned +14.53% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, FLRG is up 12.75% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, FLRG compounded at +18.71% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.01% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +16.45% annualized vs +15.24%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.6% for FLRG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for FLRG and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLRG charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLRG currently yields 1.37% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
82.2% of FLRG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 43.2% of VOO's money is in holdings FLRG also owns.
Most of FLRG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
70 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in FLRG and 505 in VOO, against full books of 103 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 429 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FLRG (56.5% of the fund), and 26 for FLRG that do not appear in VOO (15.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLRG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.59% | 7.51% | 0.08% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.60% | 6.59% | 0.01% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.37% | 4.30% | 1.07% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 5.33% | 3.25% | 2.08% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.02% | 2.77% | 0.25% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.84% | 2.02% | 0.18% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 1.91% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.70% | 0.87% | 0.83% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.63% | 0.88% | 0.75% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.54% | 0.95% | 0.59% |
82.2% of FLRG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLRG or VOO?
FLRG has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLRG or VOO?
Over the past year FLRG returned +14.53% vs +20.08% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FLRG annualized +15.24% vs +16.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLRG or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.6% for FLRG. Worst drawdown: FLRG -19.6% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both FLRG and VOO?
FLRG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLRG and VOO?
82.2% of FLRG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 43.2% of VOO's is in holdings FLRG also owns. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in FLRG and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLRG or VOO?
FLRG yields 1.37% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FLRG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FLRG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.