FLYT vs SCHD
Tradr 2X Long FLY Daily ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, FLYT or SCHD?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLYT | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $119.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.96% |
| Holdings | 8 | 204 |
| YTD Return | -75.15% | +29.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | -71.59% | +37.26%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.87% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 167.3% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -95.9% | -6.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $1,617 | $13,323Best |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 22, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2025 to Nov 6, 2026 (1 years).
FLYT vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
FLYT vs SCHD Performance
Tradr 2X Long FLY Daily ETF (FLYT) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FLYT returned -71.59% while SCHD returned +37.26%. Year to date, FLYT is down 75.15% versus a gain of 29.95% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLYT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 167.3% compared with 16.4% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.9% for FLYT and -6.9% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLYT charges 1.30% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $6 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLYT currently yields 0.00% against 2.96% for SCHD.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLYT and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLYT or SCHD?
FLYT has an expense ratio of 1.30% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $124 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLYT or SCHD?
Over the past year FLYT returned -71.59% vs +37.26% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FLYT annualized -83.83% vs +33.23% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLYT or SCHD?
FLYT has been the more volatile fund at 167.3% annualized versus 16.4% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: FLYT -95.9% vs SCHD -6.9%.
Should I hold both FLYT and SCHD?
FLYT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLYT or SCHD?
FLYT yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 2.96%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than FLYT?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.