FMTL vs IVV
First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FMTL or IVV?
FMTL has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FMTL led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMTL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $30M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.40% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 100 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +26.35%Best | +14.14% |
| 1Y Return | +54.57%Best | +17.30% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.63% |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.3% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FMTL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FMTL vs IVV Performance
First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FMTL returned +54.57% while IVV returned +17.30%. Year to date, FMTL is up 26.35% versus a gain of 14.14% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMTL charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMTL currently yields 1.40% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
12.9% of FMTL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.4% of IVV's money is in holdings FMTL also owns.
FMTL and IVV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in FMTL and 490 in IVV, against full books of 100 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 480 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FMTL (98.3% of the fund), and 9 for FMTL that do not appear in IVV (10.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FMTL and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMTL or IVV?
FMTL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FMTL or IVV?
Over the past year FMTL returned +54.57% vs +17.30% for IVV, so FMTL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FMTL and IVV?
12.9% of FMTL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.4% of IVV's is in holdings FMTL also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in FMTL and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMTL or IVV?
FMTL yields 1.40% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FMTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FMTL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FMTL led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.