FNGG vs HCOM
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
HCOM has a lower expense ratio. FNGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. HCOM offers more diversification with 55 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | HCOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $116M | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.05% | 10.95% | |
| Holdings | 18 | 55 | |
| YTD Return | +35.22% | +0.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.75% | -4.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +61.90% | -6.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.6% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.3% | -28.8% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Alternative | Commodity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | Sep 14, 2021 |
FNGG vs HCOM Performance
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year FNGG returned +35.75% while HCOM returned -4.90%. Year to date, FNGG is up 35.22% versus a gain of 0.71% for HCOM.
Over three years, FNGG compounded at +61.90% per year against -6.95% for HCOM. Across the full 4-year window we track, FNGG has the edge at +4.72% annualized vs +0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.6% compared with 14.7% for HCOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.3% for FNGG and -28.8% for HCOM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.19. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGG charges 0.97% per year while HCOM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $59 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGG currently yields 11.05% against 10.95% for HCOM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGG or HCOM?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while HCOM charges 0.59%. HCOM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $38 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGG or HCOM?
Over the past year FNGG returned +35.75% vs -4.90% for HCOM, so FNGG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FNGG annualized +4.72% vs +0.68% for HCOM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGG or HCOM?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 58.6% annualized versus 14.7% for HCOM. Worst drawdown: FNGG -91.3% vs HCOM -28.8%.
Should I hold both FNGG and HCOM?
FNGG and HCOM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.19, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGG or HCOM?
FNGG yields 11.05% while HCOM yields 10.95%, so FNGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.