FNGG vs VOO
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FNGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $116M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.05% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 18 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +36.18% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.31% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +60.57% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.6% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FNGG vs VOO Performance
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGG returned +34.31% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, FNGG is up 36.18% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, FNGG compounded at +60.57% per year against +21.80% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.6% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.3% for FNGG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGG charges 0.97% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $3 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGG currently yields 11.05% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FNGG and VOO share 10 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 26.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGG or VOO?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGG or VOO?
Over the past year FNGG returned +34.31% vs +22.02% for VOO, so FNGG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FNGG annualized +4.86% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGG or VOO?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 58.6% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FNGG -91.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FNGG and VOO?
FNGG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGG and VOO?
FNGG and VOO share 10 common holdings with a 26.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGG or VOO?
FNGG yields 11.05% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FNGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.