FNGG vs VTI
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FNGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $143M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.70% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 18 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +29.44% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.54% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +60.38% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.76% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
FNGG vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGG returned +35.54% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, FNGG is up 29.44% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, FNGG compounded at +60.38% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.76% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +3.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.3% for FNGG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGG charges 0.97% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $3 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGG currently yields 10.70% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FNGG and VTI share 10 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGG or VTI?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGG or VTI?
Over the past year FNGG returned +35.54% vs +22.35% for VTI, so FNGG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FNGG annualized +3.76% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGG or VTI?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 58.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FNGG -91.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FNGG and VTI?
FNGG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGG and VTI?
FNGG and VTI share 10 common holdings with a 24.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGG or VTI?
FNGG yields 10.70% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FNGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.