FNGG vs SCHD
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FNGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $116M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.05% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 18 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +36.18% | +26.21% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.31% | +29.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +60.57% | +15.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.3% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
FNGG vs SCHD Performance
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FNGG returned +34.31% while SCHD returned +29.99%. Year to date, FNGG is up 36.18% versus a gain of 26.21% for SCHD.
Over three years, FNGG compounded at +60.57% per year against +15.73% for SCHD. Across the full 5-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.50% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.3% for FNGG and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGG charges 0.97% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $6 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGG currently yields 11.05% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
FNGG and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 113 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGG or SCHD?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGG or SCHD?
Over the past year FNGG returned +34.31% vs +29.99% for SCHD, so FNGG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FNGG annualized +4.86% vs +11.50% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGG or SCHD?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 58.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: FNGG -91.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both FNGG and SCHD?
FNGG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGG and SCHD?
FNGG and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 113 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGG or SCHD?
FNGG yields 11.05% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so FNGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.