FTAG vs IVV
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FTAG or IVV?
Agriculture against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTAG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 61 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +18.36%Best | +12.70% |
| 1Y Return | +17.63% | +19.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.76% | +21.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.44% | +12.75%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.8% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -98.4% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,842 | $18,221Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.4% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Agriculture | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2010 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 12, 2010 to Sep 8, 2026 (16.5 years).
FTAG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.5 years both funds cover.
FTAG vs IVV Performance
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTAG returned +17.63% while IVV returned +19.36%. Year to date, FTAG is up 18.36% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Over three years, FTAG compounded at +6.76% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +3.44% and +12.75% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.69% annualized vs -17.03%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTAG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.8% compared with 14.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -98.4% for FTAG and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTAG charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTAG currently yields 1.30% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
24.6% of FTAG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.3% of IVV's money is in holdings FTAG also owns.
FTAG and IVV share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in FTAG and 504 in IVV, against full books of 61 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 489 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FTAG (98.9% of the fund), and 9 for FTAG that do not appear in IVV (10.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
24.6% of FTAG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTAG or IVV?
FTAG has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTAG or IVV?
Over the past year FTAG returned +17.63% vs +19.36% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), FTAG annualized -17.03% vs +12.69% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTAG or IVV?
FTAG has been the more volatile fund at 30.8% annualized versus 14.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FTAG -98.4% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both FTAG and IVV?
FTAG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTAG and IVV?
24.6% of FTAG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.3% of IVV's is in holdings FTAG also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in FTAG and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTAG or IVV?
FTAG yields 1.30% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FTAG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FTAG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.