FTDS vs VTI
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FTDS or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. FTDS is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTDS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $40M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 102 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +11.06% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.80% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.84% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.29% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -54.7%Best | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,217 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.0%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2006 to Sep 25, 2026 (19.8 years).
FTDS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
FTDS vs VTI Performance
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTDS returned +15.80% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, FTDS is up 11.06% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, FTDS compounded at +16.84% per year against +23.04% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.29% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.34% annualized vs +6.52%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.7% for FTDS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTDS charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTDS currently yields 1.49% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.9% of FTDS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.4% of VTI's money is in holdings FTDS also owns.
Most of FTDS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTDS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 102 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,101 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FTDS (95.1% of the fund), and 0 for FTDS that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTDS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A | 2.76% | 0.04% | 2.72% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 2.36% | 0.12% | 2.24% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 2.28% | 0.12% | 2.16% |
| APAApa Corp | 2.34% | 0.02% | 2.32% |
| BRBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 2.33% | 0.02% | 2.31% |
| GRMNGarminltd. | 2.18% | 0.07% | 2.11% |
| BKRBaker Hughes Co | 2.17% | 0.08% | 2.09% |
| DGXQuest Diagnostics Inc | 2.18% | 0.04% | 2.14% |
| DINOHF Sinclair Corp | 2.19% | 0.02% | 2.17% |
| TSCOTractor Supply Co. | 2.19% | 0.02% | 2.17% |
97.9% of FTDS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTDS or VTI?
FTDS has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTDS or VTI?
Over the past year FTDS returned +15.80% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), FTDS annualized +6.52% vs +9.34% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTDS or VTI?
FTDS has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FTDS -54.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FTDS and VTI?
FTDS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTDS and VTI?
97.9% of FTDS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.4% of VTI's is in holdings FTDS also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTDS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTDS or VTI?
FTDS yields 1.49% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FTDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FTDS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. FTDS is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.