FUTG vs QQQ
Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FUTG or QQQ?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FUTG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 5 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -75.28% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | -71.21% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FUTG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FUTG vs QQQ Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FUTG returned -71.21% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, FUTG is down 75.28% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FUTG charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FUTG currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in FUTG and 102 in QQQ, totalling 9.2% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in FUTG and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 5 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FUTG and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FUTG or QQQ?
FUTG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FUTG or QQQ?
Over the past year FUTG returned -71.21% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FUTG or QQQ?
FUTG yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FUTG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.