FUTG vs VYM
Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FUTG or VYM?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FUTG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 5 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -74.29% | +10.96%Best |
| 1Y Return | -70.06% | +15.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.78% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.05% |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FUTG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FUTG vs VYM Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FUTG returned -70.06% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, FUTG is down 74.29% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FUTG charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FUTG currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in FUTG and 557 in VYM, totalling 9.2% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in FUTG and 557 in VYM, against full books of 5 and 613.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FUTG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FUTG or VYM?
FUTG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FUTG or VYM?
Over the past year FUTG returned -70.06% vs +15.42% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FUTG or VYM?
FUTG yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FUTG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.