FUTG vs VTI
Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FUTG or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FUTG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -75.28% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | -71.21% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FUTG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FUTG vs VTI Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FUTG returned -71.21% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, FUTG is down 75.28% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FUTG charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FUTG currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in FUTG and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 9.2% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in FUTG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 5 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FUTG and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FUTG or VTI?
FUTG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FUTG or VTI?
Over the past year FUTG returned -71.21% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FUTG or VTI?
FUTG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FUTG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.