FUTG vs VOO

FUTG vs VOO

Which is better, FUTG or VOO?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFUTGVOO
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM$19M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings10506
YTD Return-80.27%+13.58%Best
1Y Return-82.46%+13.60%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.71%
Volatility (annualized)91.7%13.2%Best
Max Drawdown-86.2%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1 years$2,414$11,692Best
Fund FamilyLeverage SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 14, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 14, 2025 to Oct 27, 2026 (1 years).

FUTG vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.

FUTG vs VOO Performance

Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FUTG returned -82.46% while VOO returned +13.60%. Year to date, FUTG is down 80.27% versus a gain of 13.58% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FUTG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 91.7% compared with 13.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.2% for FUTG and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FUTG charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FUTG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FUTG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FUTGVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FUTG or VOO?

FUTG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FUTG or VOO?

Over the past year FUTG returned -82.46% vs +13.60% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FUTG annualized -75.86% vs +16.92% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FUTG or VOO?

FUTG has been the more volatile fund at 91.7% annualized versus 13.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FUTG -86.2% vs VOO -8.9%.

Should I hold both FUTG and VOO?

FUTG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FUTG or VOO?

FUTG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than FUTG?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.