FUTG vs VOO
Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FUTG or VOO?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FUTG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -74.40% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | -70.20% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.85% |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FUTG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FUTG vs VOO Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FUTG returned -70.20% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, FUTG is down 74.40% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FUTG charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FUTG currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in FUTG and 494 in VOO, totalling 9.2% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in FUTG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 5 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FUTG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FUTG or VOO?
FUTG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FUTG or VOO?
Over the past year FUTG returned -70.20% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FUTG or VOO?
FUTG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FUTG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.