FYLD vs IVV
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FYLD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FYLD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $702M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.30% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 110 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +23.75% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.18% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.30% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.70% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 2, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
FYLD vs IVV Performance
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FYLD returned +35.18% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, FYLD is up 23.75% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, FYLD compounded at +24.30% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.70% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, FYLD has the edge at +8.50% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FYLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.5% for FYLD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FYLD charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FYLD currently yields 3.30% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FYLD and IVV share 0 holdings out of 607 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FYLD or IVV?
FYLD has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FYLD or IVV?
Over the past year FYLD returned +35.18% vs +21.89% for IVV, so FYLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FYLD annualized +8.50% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FYLD or IVV?
FYLD has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FYLD -44.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FYLD and IVV?
FYLD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FYLD and IVV?
FYLD and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 607 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FYLD or IVV?
FYLD yields 3.30% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.