FYLD vs VOO
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FYLD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FYLD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $702M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.30% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 110 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +22.53% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.24% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.91% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.81% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 2, 2013 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FYLD vs VOO Performance
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FYLD returned +34.24% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, FYLD is up 22.53% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, FYLD compounded at +23.91% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.81% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FYLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.5% for FYLD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FYLD charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FYLD currently yields 3.30% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FYLD and VOO share 0 holdings out of 607 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FYLD or VOO?
FYLD has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FYLD or VOO?
Over the past year FYLD returned +34.24% vs +20.92% for VOO, so FYLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FYLD annualized +8.42% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FYLD or VOO?
FYLD has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FYLD -44.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FYLD and VOO?
FYLD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FYLD and VOO?
FYLD and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 607 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FYLD or VOO?
FYLD yields 3.30% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.