GENW vs IVV
Genter Capital International Dividend ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GENW delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GENW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.30% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 36 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +16.65% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.77% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Genter Capital Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
GENW vs IVV Performance
Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) is a ETF from Genter Capital Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GENW returned +27.77% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, GENW is up 16.65% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.3% for GENW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.4% for GENW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GENW charges 0.40% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GENW currently yields 2.30% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GENW and IVV share 0 holdings out of 540 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GENW or IVV?
GENW has an expense ratio of 0.40% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GENW or IVV?
Over the past year GENW returned +27.77% vs +22.02% for IVV, so GENW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GENW annualized +35.78% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GENW or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.3% for GENW. Worst drawdown: GENW -14.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GENW and IVV?
GENW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GENW and IVV?
GENW and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 540 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GENW or IVV?
GENW yields 2.30% while IVV yields 1.09%, so GENW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.