GEOA vs VTI
WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GEOA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GEOA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $886,559.25 | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.55% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 63 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.54% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.63% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
GEOA vs VTI Performance
WisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities Fund ETF (GEOA) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GEOA returned +24.63% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GEOA is up 8.54% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.6% for GEOA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.7% for GEOA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GEOA charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEOA currently yields 0.55% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GEOA and VTI share 29 holdings out of 2821 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GEOA or VTI?
GEOA has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GEOA or VTI?
Over the past year GEOA returned +24.63% vs +21.39% for VTI, so GEOA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GEOA annualized +19.94% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GEOA or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.6% for GEOA. Worst drawdown: GEOA -11.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GEOA and VTI?
GEOA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GEOA and VTI?
GEOA and VTI share 29 common holdings with a 7.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2821 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GEOA or VTI?
GEOA yields 0.55% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.