GGM vs VOO
GGM Macro Alignment ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.94% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $21M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.40% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.75% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.68% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.37% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | GGM Wealth Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GGM vs VOO Performance
GGM Macro Alignment ETF (GGM) is a ETF from GGM Wealth Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGM returned +19.68% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, GGM is up 16.75% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, GGM compounded at +10.37% per year against +21.79% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.3% for GGM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for GGM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGM charges 0.94% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $94 vs $3 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGM currently yields 1.40% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GGM and VOO share 0 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGM or VOO?
GGM has an expense ratio of 0.94% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGM or VOO?
Over the past year GGM returned +19.68% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), GGM annualized +10.37% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGM or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.3% for GGM. Worst drawdown: GGM -19.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GGM and VOO?
GGM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGM and VOO?
GGM and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGM or VOO?
GGM yields 1.40% while VOO yields 1.08%, so GGM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.