GGM vs VXUS
GGM Macro Alignment ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.94% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $21M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.40% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +17.73% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.36% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.76% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | GGM Wealth Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GGM vs VXUS Performance
GGM Macro Alignment ETF (GGM) is a ETF from GGM Wealth Advisors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGM returned +21.36% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, GGM is up 17.73% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, GGM compounded at +10.76% per year against +20.34% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, GGM has the edge at +10.76% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.3% for GGM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for GGM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGM charges 0.94% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $94 vs $5 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGM currently yields 1.40% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GGM and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7874 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGM or VXUS?
GGM has an expense ratio of 0.94% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGM or VXUS?
Over the past year GGM returned +21.36% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), GGM annualized +10.76% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGM or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.3% for GGM. Worst drawdown: GGM -19.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GGM and VXUS?
GGM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGM and VXUS?
GGM and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7874 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGM or VXUS?
GGM yields 1.40% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.