GHTA vs QQQ
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GHTA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.77% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $42M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.77% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +2.74% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.89% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.65% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GHTA vs QQQ Performance
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) is a ETF from Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GHTA returned +2.89% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, GHTA is up 2.74% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, GHTA compounded at +8.65% per year against +26.64% for QQQ. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 11.3% for GHTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.9% for GHTA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GHTA charges 1.77% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $177 vs $18 annually, a gap of $159 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GHTA currently yields 3.77% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GHTA and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 127 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GHTA or QQQ?
GHTA has an expense ratio of 1.77% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $159 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GHTA or QQQ?
Over the past year GHTA returned +2.89% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GHTA annualized +6.96% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GHTA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 11.3% for GHTA. Worst drawdown: GHTA -13.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GHTA and QQQ?
GHTA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GHTA and QQQ?
GHTA and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 127 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GHTA or QQQ?
GHTA yields 3.77% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GHTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.