GHTA vs VOO
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GHTA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.77% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $41M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.74% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.81% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.87% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.62% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GHTA vs VOO Performance
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) is a ETF from Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GHTA returned +3.87% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, GHTA is up 2.81% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, GHTA compounded at +8.62% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.3% for GHTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.9% for GHTA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GHTA charges 1.77% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $177 vs $3 annually, a gap of $174 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GHTA currently yields 3.74% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GHTA and VOO share 1 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GHTA | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLB:CW | 1.28% | 0.11% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GHTA or VOO?
GHTA has an expense ratio of 1.77% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $174 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GHTA or VOO?
Over the past year GHTA returned +3.87% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GHTA annualized +6.98% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GHTA or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.3% for GHTA. Worst drawdown: GHTA -13.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GHTA and VOO?
GHTA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GHTA and VOO?
GHTA and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GHTA or VOO?
GHTA yields 3.74% while VOO yields 1.09%, so GHTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.