GHTA vs IVV
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GHTA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.77% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $42M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.77% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +3.46% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.98% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.92% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
GHTA vs IVV Performance
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) is a ETF from Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GHTA returned +2.98% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, GHTA is up 3.46% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, GHTA compounded at +8.92% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, GHTA has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.3% for GHTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.9% for GHTA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GHTA charges 1.77% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $177 vs $3 annually, a gap of $174 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GHTA currently yields 3.77% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GHTA or IVV?
GHTA has an expense ratio of 1.77% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $174 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GHTA or IVV?
Over the past year GHTA returned +2.98% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GHTA annualized +7.09% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GHTA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.3% for GHTA. Worst drawdown: GHTA -13.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GHTA and IVV?
GHTA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GHTA and IVV?
GHTA and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GHTA or IVV?
GHTA yields 3.77% while IVV yields 1.10%, so GHTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.