GHTA vs VYM
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GHTA | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.77% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $41M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.74% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +2.67% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.03% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.57% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GHTA vs VYM Performance
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) is a ETF from Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GHTA returned +3.03% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, GHTA is up 2.67% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, GHTA compounded at +8.57% per year against +18.60% for VYM. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.11% annualized vs +6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 11.3% for GHTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.9% for GHTA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GHTA charges 1.77% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $177 vs $4 annually, a gap of $173 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GHTA currently yields 3.74% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GHTA and VYM share 1 holdings out of 574 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GHTA | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLB:CW | 1.28% | 0.34% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GHTA or VYM?
GHTA has an expense ratio of 1.77% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $173 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GHTA or VYM?
Over the past year GHTA returned +3.03% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GHTA annualized +6.95% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GHTA or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 11.3% for GHTA. Worst drawdown: GHTA -13.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GHTA and VYM?
GHTA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GHTA and VYM?
GHTA and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 574 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GHTA or VYM?
GHTA yields 3.74% while VYM yields 2.86%, so GHTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.