GJUN vs GMAY
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June vs FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May
Which is better, GJUN or GMAY?
GMAY has been ahead.
GMAY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GJUN | GMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $510M | $446M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +7.10% | +7.46%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.23% | +9.72%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.25% | +12.43%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.9%Tie | 5.9%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -11.0%Best | -11.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $14,174 | $14,348Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2023 | May 19, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 20, 2023 to Oct 13, 2026 (3.3 years).
GJUN vs GMAY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
GJUN vs GMAY Performance
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year GJUN returned +9.23% while GMAY returned +9.72%. Year to date, GJUN is up 7.10% versus a gain of 7.46% for GMAY.
Over three years, GJUN compounded at +12.25% per year against +12.43% for GMAY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GJUN and GMAY have been equally volatile, both at 5.9% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for GJUN and -11.8% for GMAY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GJUN charges 0.85% per year while GMAY charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, GJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for GMAY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GJUN and GMAY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GJUN or GMAY?
GJUN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while GMAY charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, GJUN or GMAY?
Over the past year GJUN returned +9.23% vs +9.72% for GMAY, so GMAY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GJUN or GMAY?
GJUN and GMAY have been equally volatile, both at 5.9% annualized. Worst drawdown: GJUN -11.0% vs GMAY -11.8%.
Should I hold both GJUN and GMAY?
GJUN and GMAY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GJUN or GMAY?
GJUN yields 0.00% while GMAY yields 0.00%, so GMAY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GMAY better than GJUN?
GMAY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.