GLIN vs VTI
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLIN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $95M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.87% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.40% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.39% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.72% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.11% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
GLIN vs VTI Performance
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLIN returned +1.39% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GLIN is down 2.40% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, GLIN compounded at +7.72% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.11% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs -2.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.4% for GLIN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLIN charges 0.72% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLIN currently yields 0.87% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GLIN and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2866 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLIN | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAL | 4.69% | 0.04% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLIN or VTI?
GLIN has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLIN or VTI?
Over the past year GLIN returned +1.39% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GLIN annualized -2.51% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLIN or VTI?
GLIN has been the more volatile fund at 29.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GLIN -79.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GLIN and VTI?
GLIN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLIN and VTI?
GLIN and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2866 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLIN or VTI?
GLIN yields 0.87% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.