GLIN vs VXUS
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLIN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $96M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -1.50% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.15% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.48% | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.34% | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2010 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GLIN vs VXUS Performance
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLIN returned +4.15% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, GLIN is down 1.50% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Over three years, GLIN compounded at +8.48% per year against +19.79% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.34% and +9.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.88% annualized vs -2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.4% for GLIN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLIN charges 0.72% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $5 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLIN currently yields 0.84% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GLIN and VXUS share 52 holdings out of 7889 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLIN or VXUS?
GLIN has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLIN or VXUS?
Over the past year GLIN returned +4.15% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GLIN annualized -2.46% vs +4.88% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLIN or VXUS?
GLIN has been the more volatile fund at 29.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GLIN -79.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GLIN and VXUS?
GLIN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLIN and VXUS?
GLIN and VXUS share 52 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7889 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLIN or VXUS?
GLIN yields 0.84% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.