GLIN vs VYM
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GLIN or VYM?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLIN | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $95M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 82 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -5.44% | +10.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.27% | +14.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.25% | +17.50%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.98% | +11.60%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.4% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -79.4% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,500 | $17,311Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.4% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2010 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 25, 2010 to Sep 23, 2026 (16.1 years).
GLIN vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.1 years both funds cover.
GLIN vs VYM Performance
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLIN returned -2.27% while VYM returned +14.28%. Year to date, GLIN is down 5.44% versus a gain of 10.23% for VYM.
Over three years, GLIN compounded at +5.25% per year against +17.50% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +0.98% and +11.60% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +10.59% annualized vs -2.69%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.4% compared with 13.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.4% for GLIN and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLIN charges 0.72% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $4 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLIN currently yields 0.84% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
4.9% of GLIN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings GLIN also owns.
GLIN and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in GLIN and 557 in VYM, against full books of 82 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 527 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GLIN (97.0% of the fund), and 1 for GLIN that do not appear in VYM (4.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLIN | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALHalliburton Co. | 4.86% | 0.11% | 4.75% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GLIN and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLIN or VYM?
GLIN has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $68 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLIN or VYM?
Over the past year GLIN returned -2.27% vs +14.28% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GLIN annualized -2.69% vs +10.59% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GLIN or VYM?
GLIN has been the more volatile fund at 29.4% annualized versus 13.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GLIN -79.4% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both GLIN and VYM?
GLIN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GLIN and VYM?
4.9% of GLIN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's is in holdings GLIN also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in GLIN and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLIN or VYM?
GLIN yields 0.84% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GLIN?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.