GLIN vs VYM
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLIN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $96M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -1.50% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.15% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.48% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.34% | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2010 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GLIN vs VYM Performance
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLIN returned +4.15% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, GLIN is down 1.50% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Over three years, GLIN compounded at +8.48% per year against +18.54% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +3.34% and +12.25% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs -2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.4% for GLIN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLIN charges 0.72% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $4 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLIN currently yields 0.84% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GLIN and VYM share 0 holdings out of 638 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLIN or VYM?
GLIN has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $68 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLIN or VYM?
Over the past year GLIN returned +4.15% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GLIN annualized -2.46% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLIN or VYM?
GLIN has been the more volatile fund at 29.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GLIN -79.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GLIN and VYM?
GLIN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLIN and VYM?
GLIN and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 638 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLIN or VYM?
GLIN yields 0.84% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.