GLIN vs VOO
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GLIN or VOO?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLIN | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $95M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 82 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -5.44% | +13.31%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.27% | +17.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.25% | +22.72%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.98% | +13.19%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.3% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -79.4% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,500 | $18,580Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.4% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 23, 2026 (16 years).
GLIN vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GLIN vs VOO Performance
VanEck India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLIN returned -2.27% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, GLIN is down 5.44% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, GLIN compounded at +5.25% per year against +22.72% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.98% and +13.19% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.43% annualized vs -3.03%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.4% for GLIN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLIN charges 0.72% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLIN currently yields 0.84% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
4.9% of GLIN's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
GLIN and VOO share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in GLIN and 494 in VOO, against full books of 82 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 486 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GLIN (99.1% of the fund), and 1 for GLIN that do not appear in VOO (4.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLIN | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALHalliburton Co. | 4.86% | 0.04% | 4.82% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GLIN and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLIN or VOO?
GLIN has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLIN or VOO?
Over the past year GLIN returned -2.27% vs +17.07% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GLIN annualized -3.03% vs +13.43% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GLIN or VOO?
GLIN has been the more volatile fund at 29.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GLIN -79.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GLIN and VOO?
GLIN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GLIN and VOO?
4.9% of GLIN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.0% of VOO's is in holdings GLIN also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in GLIN and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLIN or VOO?
GLIN yields 0.84% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GLIN?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.