GLRY vs QQQ
Inspire Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLRY | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $171M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +12.07% | +17.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.55% | +24.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.15% | +26.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.91% | +15.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Inspire ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GLRY vs QQQ Performance
Inspire Growth ETF (GLRY) is a ETF from Inspire ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GLRY returned +18.55% while QQQ returned +24.93%. Year to date, GLRY is up 12.07% versus a gain of 17.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, GLRY compounded at +17.15% per year against +26.19% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.91% and +15.34% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.06% annualized vs +10.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.4% for GLRY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.6% for GLRY and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLRY charges 0.80% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $18 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLRY currently yields 0.17% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GLRY and QQQ share 4 holdings out of 131 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLRY or QQQ?
GLRY has an expense ratio of 0.80% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLRY or QQQ?
Over the past year GLRY returned +18.55% vs +24.93% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GLRY annualized +10.09% vs +13.06% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLRY or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.4% for GLRY. Worst drawdown: GLRY -40.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GLRY and QQQ?
GLRY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLRY and QQQ?
GLRY and QQQ share 4 common holdings with a 5.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 131 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLRY or QQQ?
GLRY yields 0.17% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.