GLRY vs VOO
Inspire Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GLRY or VOO?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLRY | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $164M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 34 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +8.34% | +13.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.16% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.95% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.79% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -40.6% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,888 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.7% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Inspire ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 8, 2020 to Sep 4, 2026 (5.7 years).
GLRY vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.
GLRY vs VOO Performance
Inspire Growth ETF (GLRY) is an ETF from Inspire ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLRY returned +12.16% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, GLRY is up 8.34% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, GLRY compounded at +15.95% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.79% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.18% annualized vs +9.36%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLRY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.6% for GLRY and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLRY charges 0.80% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLRY currently yields 0.17% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
45.5% of GLRY's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 4.4% of VOO's money is in holdings GLRY also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, GLRY as of Aug 17, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
12 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in GLRY and 505 in VOO, against full books of 34 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 485 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GLRY (95.0% of the fund), and 21 for GLRY that do not appear in VOO (54.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLRY | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.85% | 2.77% | 2.08% |
| KLACKla Corp | 6.31% | 0.61% | 5.70% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 5.31% | 0.34% | 4.97% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 5.02% | 0.11% | 4.91% |
| EMEEmcor Group Inc | 4.88% | 0.06% | 4.82% |
| CASYCaseys General | 4.25% | 0.05% | 4.20% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 3.25% | 0.11% | 3.14% |
| NRGNrg Energy | 2.67% | 0.05% | 2.62% |
| IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc | 2.60% | 0.06% | 2.54% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 2.39% | 0.21% | 2.18% |
45.5% of GLRY is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLRY or VOO?
GLRY has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLRY or VOO?
Over the past year GLRY returned +12.16% vs +20.08% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GLRY annualized +9.36% vs +15.18% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GLRY or VOO?
GLRY has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GLRY -40.6% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both GLRY and VOO?
GLRY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GLRY and VOO?
45.5% of GLRY's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 4.4% of VOO's is in holdings GLRY also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in GLRY and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLRY or VOO?
GLRY yields 0.17% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GLRY?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.