GMET vs SCHD
VanEck Green Metals ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GMET delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMET | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $26M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +19.32% | +28.63% | |
| 1Y Return | +103.96% | +32.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.58% | +16.97% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.04% | +10.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.0% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
GMET vs SCHD Performance
VanEck Green Metals ETF (GMET) is a ETF from VanEck and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GMET returned +103.96% while SCHD returned +32.53%. Year to date, GMET is up 19.32% versus a gain of 28.63% for SCHD.
Over three years, GMET compounded at +13.58% per year against +16.97% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +7.04% and +10.47% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.63% annualized vs +7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.0% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for GMET and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMET charges 0.61% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $6 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMET currently yields 1.17% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
GMET and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 153 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMET or SCHD?
GMET has an expense ratio of 0.61% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GMET or SCHD?
Over the past year GMET returned +103.96% vs +32.53% for SCHD, so GMET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), GMET annualized +7.86% vs +11.63% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GMET or SCHD?
GMET has been the more volatile fund at 32.0% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: GMET -53.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both GMET and SCHD?
GMET and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GMET and SCHD?
GMET and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 153 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMET or SCHD?
GMET yields 1.17% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.