GMET vs VXUS
VanEck Green Metals ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. GMET delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMET | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $26M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +19.32% | +13.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +103.96% | +24.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.58% | +20.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.04% | +9.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GMET vs VXUS Performance
VanEck Green Metals ETF (GMET) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GMET returned +103.96% while VXUS returned +24.30%. Year to date, GMET is up 19.32% versus a gain of 13.56% for VXUS.
Over three years, GMET compounded at +13.58% per year against +20.24% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.04% and +9.37% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, GMET has the edge at +7.86% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for GMET and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMET charges 0.61% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $5 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMET currently yields 1.17% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GMET and VXUS share 38 holdings out of 7884 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMET or VXUS?
GMET has an expense ratio of 0.61% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GMET or VXUS?
Over the past year GMET returned +103.96% vs +24.30% for VXUS, so GMET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), GMET annualized +7.86% vs +4.79% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GMET or VXUS?
GMET has been the more volatile fund at 32.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GMET -53.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GMET and VXUS?
GMET and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GMET and VXUS?
GMET and VXUS share 38 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7884 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMET or VXUS?
GMET yields 1.17% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.