GMET vs VYM
VanEck Green Metals ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GMET delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMET | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $26M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +19.32% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +103.96% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.58% | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.04% | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GMET vs VYM Performance
VanEck Green Metals ETF (GMET) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GMET returned +103.96% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, GMET is up 19.32% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Over three years, GMET compounded at +13.58% per year against +19.07% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.04% and +12.50% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, GMET has the edge at +7.86% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for GMET and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMET charges 0.61% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $4 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMET currently yields 1.17% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMET or VYM?
GMET has an expense ratio of 0.61% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GMET or VYM?
Over the past year GMET returned +103.96% vs +23.48% for VYM, so GMET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), GMET annualized +7.86% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GMET or VYM?
GMET has been the more volatile fund at 32.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GMET -53.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GMET and VYM?
GMET and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GMET and VYM?
GMET and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 654 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMET or VYM?
GMET yields 1.17% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.