GMET vs IVV
VanEck Green Metals ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GMET or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GMET led over 1Y, IVV over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMET | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $26M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 56 | 508 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.0% | 16.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 7.1 years | $17,112 | $30,119Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.1% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 211 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. GMET has data through Feb 12, 2026 and IVV through Sep 11, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 7.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 21, 2018 to Feb 12, 2026 (7.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.0% compared with 16.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for GMET and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMET charges 0.61% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $3 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMET currently yields 1.17% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
8.0% of GMET's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings GMET also owns.
GMET and IVV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 309 days apart, GMET as of Sep 30, 2025 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GMET and 505 in IVV, against full books of 56 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GMET (99.2% of the fund), and 2 for GMET that do not appear in IVV (5.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GMET and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMET or IVV?
GMET has an expense ratio of 0.61% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, GMET or IVV?
GMET has been the more volatile fund at 32.0% annualized versus 16.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GMET -53.9% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both GMET and IVV?
GMET and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GMET and IVV?
8.0% of GMET's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's is in holdings GMET also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GMET and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMET or IVV?
GMET yields 1.17% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GMET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GMET?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GMET led over 1Y, IVV over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.