GPRF vs VYM
Goldman Sachs Access US Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GPRF | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $146M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.66% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 510 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | +0.48% | +14.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.32% | +20.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.9% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GPRF vs VYM Performance
Goldman Sachs Access US Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GPRF returned +2.32% while VYM returned +20.67%. Year to date, GPRF is up 0.48% versus a gain of 14.18% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 3.9% for GPRF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.2% for GPRF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GPRF charges 0.45% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $4 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GPRF currently yields 5.66% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GPRF and VYM share 25 holdings out of 1012 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPRF or VYM?
GPRF has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GPRF or VYM?
Over the past year GPRF returned +2.32% vs +20.67% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GPRF annualized +4.67% vs +6.97% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GPRF or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 3.9% for GPRF. Worst drawdown: GPRF -4.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GPRF and VYM?
GPRF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GPRF and VYM?
GPRF and VYM share 25 common holdings with a 3.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1012 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GPRF or VYM?
GPRF yields 5.66% while VYM yields 2.24%, so GPRF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.